Home Interactive Demo
Wigmorean Proof Chains

Interactive DAG Demo

The Wigmorean chart method applies beyond the courtroom. Each diagram below maps a real-world reasoning problem as a Directed Acyclic Graph — from a landmark criminal trial to scientific reclassification to medical diagnosis. Nodes are discrete evidence items or intermediate inferences. Gold arrows show inferential support; red dashed lines show counter-inferences that must be resolved.

DNA · BLOOD 1-in-170M match Bundy · Bronco · Rockingham TRACE Aris Light glove pair Bruno Magli size 12 prints TIMELINE No alibi 9:36–10:54 PM Bronco absent · dark figure PHYSICAL LINK Three independent chains converge on Simpson MOTIVE 1989 battery · 62 incidents 911 calls · stalking pattern FLIGHT Bronco slow-speed chase Disguise · passport · $8K cash CONTAMINATION LAPD lab · Fuhrman “If it doesn’t fit…” PROBANDUM Simpson committed the murders
Inferential support (three independent evidence chains converge)
Counter-inference (defense: evidence contamination & police misconduct)
Ultimate probandum

Following Anderson & Twining’s Wigmorean methodology (Analysis of Evidence, 2005), the prosecution’s case derives its power from convergence: three independent evidence streams — DNA blood matching Simpson at 1-in-170 million across the crime scene, his vehicle, and his home; physical trace evidence linking a split pair of Aris Light gloves and size-12 Bruno Magli shoe prints; and an unaccounted timeline with the Bronco absent during the murder window — all point to a single physical-link inference. Motive evidence (documented domestic violence including a 1989 battery conviction) and flight conduct (the Bronco chase with a disguise, passport, and cash) provide additional support. The defense counter-inference attacks the convergence node itself: LAPD crime-lab contamination, Detective Fuhrman’s credibility and racial bias, and the courtroom glove demonstration sought to sever the evidentiary chains from their conclusion. The jury’s acquittal rested on resolving this counter-inference in Simpson’s favor — collapsing the physical-link hub despite the prosecution’s convergent architecture.

Scroll to Top